<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/inc/gmdd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Geoscientific Model Development Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1991-9611</issn>
		<eissn>1991-962X</eissn>
		<volume_number>2</volume_number>
		<issue_number>2</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2009</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/gmdd-2-1407-2009</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/2/1407/2009/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/2/1407/2009/gmdd-2-1407-2009.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/2/1407/2009/gmdd-2-1407-2009.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>1407</start_page>
	<end_page>1446</end_page>
	<publication_date>2009-12-08</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Modeling the statistical distributions of cosmogenic exposure dates from moraines</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1,2">
			<name>P. J. Applegate</name>
			<email>papplega@geosc.psu.edu</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>N. M. Urban</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>K. Keller</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>R. B. Alley</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, 16801, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">now at: Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Cosmogenic exposure dating provides a method for estimating the ages of
glacial moraines deposited in the last ~10&lt;sup&gt;5&lt;/sup&gt; years. Cosmic rays
break atoms in surface rocks at predictable rates. Thus, the ages of moraines
are directly related to the concentrations of cosmic ray-produced nuclides in
rocks on the moraine surfaces, under ideal circumstances. However, many
geomorphic processes may interfere with cosmogenic exposure dating. Because
of these processes, boulders sometimes arrive at the moraines with
preexisting concentrations of cosmogenic nuclides, or else the boulders are
partly shielded from cosmic rays following deposition. Many methods for
estimating moraine ages from cosmogenic exposure dates exist in the
literature, but we cannot assess the appropriateness of these methods without
knowing the parent distribution from which the dates were drawn on each
moraine. Here, we make two contributions. First, we describe numerical models
of two geomorphic processes, moraine degradation and inheritance, and their
effects on cosmogenic exposure dating. Second, we assess the robustness of
various simple methods for estimating the ages of moraines from collections
of cosmogenic exposure dates. Our models estimate the probability
distributions of cosmogenic exposure dates that we would obtain from moraine
boulders with specified geomorphic histories, using Monte Carlo methods. We
expand on pioneering modeling efforts to address this problem by placing
these models into a common framework. We also evaluate the sensitivity of the
models to changes in their input parameters. The sensitivity tests show that
moraine degradation consistently produces left-skewed distributions of
exposure dates; that is, the distributions have long tails toward the young
end of the distribution. In contrast, inheritance produces right-skewed
distributions that have long tails toward the old side of the distribution.
Given representative distributions from these two models, we can determine
which methods of estimating moraine ages are most successful in recovering
the correct age for test cases where this value is known. The mean is a poor
estimator of moraine age for data sets drawn from skewed parent
distributions, and excluding outliers before calculating the mean does not
improve this mismatch. The extreme estimators (youngest date and oldest date)
perform well under specific circumstances, but fail in other cases. We
suggest a simple estimator that uses the skewnesses of individual data sets
to determine whether the youngest date, mean, or oldest date will provide the
best estimate of moraine age. Although this method is perhaps the most
globally robust of the estimators we tested, it sometimes fails
spectacularly. The failure of simple methods to provide accurate estimates of
moraine age points toward a need for more sophisticated statistical
treatments. We present improved methods for estimating moraine ages in a
companion paper.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Anderson, R. S. and Humphrey, N. F.: Interaction of weathering and transport processes in the evolution of arid landscapes, in: Quantitative dynamic stratigraphy, Prentice-Hall, 349–361, 1989. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Applegate, P. J.: Estimating the ages of glacial landforms from the statistical distributions of cosmogenic exposure dates, Ph.D dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, USA, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Applegate, P. J., Urban, N. M., Kelly, M. A., Lowell, T. V., Laabs, B. J. C., Keller, K., and Alley, R. B: Extracting moraine ages and geomorphic process information from the statistical distributions of cosmogenic exposure dates, Quaternary Res., in preparation, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Balco, G., Stone, J. O., Lifton, N. A., and Dunai, T. J.: A complete and easily accessible means of calculating surface ages or erosion rates from 10Be and 26Al measurements, Quat. Geochronol., 3, 174–195, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Benn, D. I. and Evans, D. J. A.: Glaciers and glaciation, Hodder Arnold, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Benson, L., Madole, R., Landis, G., and Gosse, J.: New data for late Pleistocene Pinedale alpine glaciation from southwestern Colorado, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 24, 49–65, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Bevington, P. R. and Robinson, D. K.: Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences, 2nd edn., McGraw-Hill, 336~pp., 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Bierman, P. R., Reuter, J. M., Pavich, M., et al.: Using cosmogenic nuclides to contrast rates of erosion and sediment yield in a semi-arid, arroyo-dominated landscape, Rio Puerco Basin, New Mexico, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 30, 935–953, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Box, G. E. P. and Draper, N.: Empirical model building and response surfaces, Wiley, 688~pp., 1987. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Briner, J. P., Kaufman, D. S., Manley, W. F., Finkel, R. C., and Caffee, M. W.: Cosmogenic exposure dating of late Pleistocene moraine stabilization in Alaska, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 117, 1108–1120, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Brown, E. T., Molnar, P., and Bourlés, D. L.: Comment on &quot;Slip-rate measurements on the Karakorum Fault may imply secular variations in fault motion&quot;, Science, 309, p 1326b, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Chambers, J. M., Cleveland, W. S., Kleiner, B., and Tukey, J. W.: Graphical methods for data analysis, Wadsworth, 395~pp., 1983. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Chevalier, M.-L., Ryerson, F. J., Tapponier, P., et al.: Slip-rate measurements on the Karakorum Fault may imply secular variations in fault motion, Science, 307, 411–414, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Croarkin, C. and Tobias, P. (Eds.): NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods, http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/ (last access: 18 September 2009) 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Dyurgerov, M. B. and Meier, M. F.: Twentieth century climate change: evidence from small glaciers, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 1406–1411, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Dreimanis, A.: Tills: their genetic terminology and classification, in: Genetic classification of glacigenic deposits, Balkema, 17–84, 1988. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Dunne, J., Elmore, D., and Muzikar, P.: Scaling factors for the rates of production of cosmogenic nuclides for geometric shielding and attenuation at depth on sloped surfaces, Geomorphology, 27, 3–11, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Fletcher, C. A. J.: Computational techniques for fluid dynamics, 2nd edn., Springer, 1, 401~pp., 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Gibbons, A. B., Megeath, J. D., and Pierce, K. L.: Probability of moraine survival in a succession of glacial advances, Geology, 12, 327–330, 1984. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Gosse, J. C., Klein, J., Evenson, E. B., Lawn, B., and Middleton, R.: Beryllium-10 dating of the duration and retreat of the last Pinedale glacial sequence, Science, 268, 1329–1333, 1995a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Gosse, J. C., Evenson, E. B., Klein, J., Lawn, B., and Middleton, R.: Precise cosmogenic 10Be measurements in western North America: support for a global Younger Dryas cooling event, Geology, 23, 877–880, 1995b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Gosse, J. C. and Phillips, F. M.: Terrestrial in situ cosmogenic nuclides: theory and application, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 20, 1475–1560, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Granger, D. E. and Muzikar, P. F.: Dating sediment burial with in situ-produced cosmogenic nuclides: theory, techniques, and limitations, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 188, 269–281, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Granger, D. E., Fabel, D., and Palmer, A. N.: Pliocene-Pleistocene incision of the Green River, Kentucky, determined from radioactive decay of cosmogenic 26Al and 10Be in Mammoth Cave sediments, Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., 113, 825–836, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Hallet, B. and Putkonen, J.: Surface dating of dynamic landforms: young boulders on aging moraines, Science, 265, 937–940, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Hanks, T.: The age of scarplike landforms from diffusion-equation analysis, in: Quaternary geochronology: methods and applications, American Geophysical Union Reference Shelf, Part~4, American Geophysical Union, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Heisinger, B., Lal, D., Jull, A. J. T., and six others: Production of selected cosmogenic radionuclides by muons 1. Fast muons, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 200, 345–355, 2002a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Heisinger, B., Lal, D., Jull, A. J. T., et al.: Production of selected cosmogenic radionuclides by muons 2. Capture of negative muons, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 200, 357–369, 2002b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Hilborn, R. and Mangel, M.: The ecological detective: confronting models with data, in: Monographs in Population Biology, Princeton University Press, 28, 315~pp., 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Ivy-Ochs, S., Kerschner, H., and Schlüchter, C.: Cosmogenic nuclides and the dating of Lateglacial and early Holocene glacier variations: the Alpine perspective, Quatern. Int., 164–165, 53–63, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Jansen, E., Overpeck, J., Briffa, K. R., et al.: Paleoclimate, in: Climate change 2007: the physical science basis: contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 433–498, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> Kaplan, M. R., Douglass, D. C., Singer, B. S., Ackert, R. P., and Caffee, M. W.: Cosmogenic nuclide chronology of pre-last glacial maximum moraines at Lago Buenos Aires, 46&amp;deg; S, Argentina, Quaternary Res., 63, 301–315, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="33" content_type="text"> Kelly, M. A., Lowell, T. V., Hall, B. L., et al.: A 10Be chronology of lateglacial and Holocene mountain glaciation in the Scoresby Sund region, east Greenland: implications for seasonality during lateglacial time, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 27, 2273–2282, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="34" content_type="text"> Kowalski, S. E., Lowell, T. V., and Evenson, E. B., in preparation, Major ice collapse (17 ka–16 ka) in the Anchorage lowland, southern Alaska, Quaternary Res., in preparation, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="35" content_type="text"> Krüger, J.: Moraine ridges formed from subglacial frozen-on sediment slabs and their differentiation from push moraines, Boreas, 25, 57–63, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="36" content_type="text"> Lal, D.: Cosmic ray labeling of erosion surfaces: in situ nuclide production rates and erosion models, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 104, 424–439, 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="37" content_type="text"> Lal, D. and Chen, J.: Cosmic ray labeling of erosion surfaces II: special cases of exposure histories of boulders, soils, and beach terraces, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 236, 797–813, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="38" content_type="text"> Licciardi, J. M., Clark, P. U., Brook, E. J., Elmore, D., and Sharma, P.: Variable responses of western U. S. glaciers during the last deglaciation, Geology, 32, 81–84, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="39" content_type="text"> Masarik, J. and Wieler, R.: Production rates of cosmogenic nuclides in boulders, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 216, 201–208, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="40" content_type="text"> Murphy, E. A.: One cause? Many causes? The argument from the bimodal distribution, J. Chron. Dis., 17, 301–324, 1964. </reference>
		<reference numeration="41" content_type="text"> Muzikar, P.: General models for episodic surface denudation and its measurement by cosmogenic nuclides, Quat. Geochronol., 4, 50–55, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="42" content_type="text"> Nash, D. B.: Morphologic dating and modeling degradation of fault scarps, in: Active Tectonics, National Academy Press, 266~pp., 1986. </reference>
		<reference numeration="43" content_type="text"> Oerlemans, J.: Extracting a climate signal from 169 glacier records, Science, 308, 675–677, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="44" content_type="text"> O&apos;Neal, M. A.: The effects of slope degradation on lichenometric dating of Little Ice Age moraines, Quat. Geochronol., 1, 121–128, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="45" content_type="text"> Pelletier, J. D., DeLong, S. B., al-Suwaidi, A. H., et al.: Evolution of the Bonneville shoreline scarp in west-central Utah: comparison of scarp-analysis methods and implications for the diffusion model of hillslope evolution, Geomorphology, 74, 257–270, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="46" content_type="text"> Pelletier, J. D.: Quantitative modeling of earth surface processes, Cambridge University Press, 304~pp., 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="47" content_type="text"> Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P.: Numerical recipes in Fortran 77, 2nd edn., Cambridge, 927~pp., 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="48" content_type="text"> Putkonen, J. and Swanson, T.: Accuracy of cosmogenic ages for moraines, Quaternary Res., 59, 255–261, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="49" content_type="text"> Putkonen, J., Connolly, J., and Orloff, T.: Landscape evolution degrades the geologic signature of past glaciations, Geomorphology, 97, 208–217, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="50" content_type="text"> Richmond, G. M.: Geologic map of the Fremont Lake South quadrangle, Sublette County, Wyoming, US Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-1138, 1:50 000, 1973. </reference>
		<reference numeration="51" content_type="text"> Roering, J. J., Kirchner, J. W., Sklar, L. S., and Dietrich, W. E.: Hillslope evolution by nonlinear creep and landsliding: an experimental study, Geology, 29, 143–146, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="52" content_type="text"> Schaefer, J. M., Oberholzer, P., Zhao, Z, et al.: Cosmogenic beryllium-10 and neon-21 dating of late Pleistocene glaciations in Nyalam, monsoonal Himalayas, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 27, 295–311, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="53" content_type="text"> Seong, Y. B., Owen, L. A., Caffee, M. W., et al.: Rates of basin-wide rockwall retreat in the K2 region of the central Karakoram defined by terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide 10Be, Geomorphology, 107, 254–262, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="54" content_type="text"> Shackleton, N. J.: The 100 000-year ice-age cycle identified and found to lag temperature, carbon dioxide, and orbital eccentricity, Science, 289, 1899–1902, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="55" content_type="text"> Wolkowinsky, A. J. and Granger, D. E.: Early Pleistocene incision of the San Juan River, Utah, dated with 26Al and 10Be, Geology, 32, 749–752, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="56" content_type="text"> Zimmerman, S. G., Evenson, E. B., Gosse, J. C., and Erskine, C. P.: Extensive boulder erosion resulting from a range fire on the type-Pinedale moraines, Fremont Lake, Wyoming, Quaternary Res., 42, 255–264, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="57" content_type="text"> Zreda, M. G., Phillips, F. M., and Elmore, D.: Cosmogenic 36Cl accumulation in unstable landforms 2. Simulations and measurements on eroding moraines, Water Resour. Res., 30, 3127–3136, 1994. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

