<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/inc/gmdd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Geoscientific Model Development Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1991-9611</issn>
		<eissn>1991-962X</eissn>
		<volume_number>2</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2009</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/gmdd-2-455-2009</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/2/455/2009/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/2/455/2009/gmdd-2-455-2009.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/2/455/2009/gmdd-2-455-2009.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>455</start_page>
	<end_page>484</end_page>
	<publication_date>2009-05-08</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Quantifying atmospheric transport, chemistry, and mixing using a new trajectory-box model and a global atmospheric-chemistry GCM</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>H. Riede</name>
			<email>hella.riede@mpic.de</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>P. Jöckel</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>R. Sander</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Air Chemistry Department, P.O. Box 3060, 55020 Mainz, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">We present a novel method for the quantification of transport, chemistry, and
mixing along atmospheric trajectories based on a consistent model hierarchy.
The hierarchy consists of the new atmospheric-chemistry trajectory-box model
CAABA/MJT and the three-dimensional (3-D) global ECHAM/MESSy
atmospheric-chemistry (EMAC) general circulation model (GCM). CAABA/MJT
employs the atmospheric box model CAABA together with the
atmospheric-chemistry submodel MECCA (M), the photochemistry submodel JVAL
(J), and the new trajectory submodel TRAJECT (T), to simulate atmospheric
chemistry along atmospheric trajectories which are provided offline. With the
same submodels coupled to the EMAC model, a unique consistency is achieved,
which allows to separate contributions of transport, chemistry, and mixing
along the trajectory pathways through comparison of results from the two
models. Consistency of transport between the trajectory-box model CAABA/MJT
and the 3-D EMAC model is achieved via calculation of trajectories based on
3-D wind fields from EMAC. The procedure to obtain the necessary statistical
basis for the quantification analysis is described as well as the
comprehensive diagnostics with respect to chemistry. The quantification
method is applied to 3-D model data as a diagnostic tool with the focus on
the transfer of results to observational data.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Arteta, J. and Cautenet, S.: Study of ozone distribution over the south-eastern France (ESCOMPTE campaign): discrimination between ozone tendencies due to chemistry and to transport, J. Atmos. Chem., 58, 111–130, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Jöckel, P., Sander, R., Kerkweg, A., Tost, H., and Lelieveld, J.: Technical Note: The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) – a new approach towards Earth System Modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 433–444, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Brühl, C., Buchholz, J., Ganzeveld, L., Hoor, P., Kerkweg, A., Lawrence, M. G., Sander, R., Steil, B., Stiller, G., Tanarhte, M., Taraborrelli, D., van Aardenne, J., and Lelieveld, J.: The atmospheric chemistry general circulation model ECHAM5/MESSy1: consistent simulation of ozone from the surface to the mesosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5067–5104, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Pozzer, A., Sander, R., and Tost, H.: Development cycle 2 of the Modular Earth Submodel System, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., in preparation, 2009.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Kerkweg, A., Sander, R., Tost, H., Jöckel, P., and Lelieveld, J.: Technical Note: Simulation of detailed aerosol chemistry on the global scale using MECCA-AERO, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2973–2985, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Knudsen, B M., Pommereau, J.-P., Garnier, A., Nunez-Pinharanda, M., Denis, L., Letrenne, G., Durand, M., and Rosen, J M.: Comparison of stratospheric air parcel trajectories based on different meteorological analyses, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 3415–3424, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Landgraf, J. and Crutzen, P J.: An efficient method for online calculations of photolysis and heating rates, J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 863–878, \doi10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Lehmann, R.: An algorithm for the determination of all significant pathways in chemical reaction systems, J. Atmos. Chem., 47, 45–78, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> McBride, J L. and Ebert, E E.: Verification of quantitative precipitation forecasts from operational numerical weather prediction models over Australia, Weather Forecast., 15, 103–121, \doi10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> McKenna, D S., Konopka, P., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G., Müller, R., Spang, R., Offermann, D., and Orsolini, Y.: A new Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS) 1. Formulation of advection and mixing, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D16), 4309, \doi10.1029/2000JD000114, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Roeckner, E., Brokopf, R., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M., Hagemann, S., Kornblueh, L., Manzini, E., Schlese, U., and Schulzweida, U.: Sensitivity of simulated climate to horizontal and vertical resolution in the ECHAM5 atmosphere model, J. Climate, 19, 3771–3791, \doi10.1175/JCLI3824.1, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Sander, R., Kerkweg, A., Jöckel, P., and Lelieveld, J.: Technical note: The new comprehensive atmospheric chemistry module MECCA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 445–450, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Sander, R., Gromov, S., Harder, H., Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Kubistin, D., Riede, H., Taraborrelli, D., and Xie, Z.-Q.: The atmospheric chemistry box model CAABA/MECCA-3.0, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., in preparation, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Sandu, A. and Sander, R.: Technical note: Simulating chemical systems in Fortran90 and Matlab with the Kinetic PreProcessor KPP-2.1, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 187–195, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Scheele, M P., Siegmund, P C., and Velthoven, P. F J.: Sensitivity of trajectories to data resolution and its dependence on the starting point: in or outside a tropopause fold, Meteorol. Appl., 3, 267–273, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Sinnhuber, B.-M., Müller, R., Langer, J., Bovensmann, H., Eyring, V., Klein, U., Trentmann, J., Burrows, J. P., and Künzi, K. F.: Interpretation of mid-stratospheric Arctic ozone measurements using a photochemical box-model, J. Atmos. Chem., 34, 281–290, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Stohl, A.: Computation, accuracy and applications of trajectories – a review and bibliography, Atmos. Environ., 32, 947–966, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Stohl, A., Wotawa, G., Seibert, P., and Kromp-Kolb, H.: Interpolation errors in wind fields as a function of spatial and temporal resolution and their impact on different types of kinematic trajectories, J. Appl. Meteorol., 34, 2149–2165, \doi10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Stohl, A., Haimberger, L., Scheele, M P., and Wernli, H.: An intercomparison of results from three trajectory models, Meteorol. Appl., 8, 127–135, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P., and Wotawa, G.: Technical note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2461–2474, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Wernli, H. and Davies, H C.: A Lagrangian-based analysis of extratropical cyclones. I: The method and some applications, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 123, 467–489, \doi10.1256/smsqj.53810, 1997. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

