Geoscientific Model Development Discussions www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net 1991-9611 1991-962X 2 2 2009 10.5194/gmdd-2-763-2009 http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/2/763/2009/ http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/2/763/2009/gmdd-2-763-2009.html http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/2/763/2009/gmdd-2-763-2009.pdf 763 795 2009-07-07 Coupling global chemistry transport models to ECMWF's integrated forecast system J. Flemming johannes.flemming@ecmwf.int A. Inness H. Flentje V. Huijnen P. Moinat M. G. Schultz O. Stein European Centre for Medium range Weather Forecasting, Reading, UK Météo-France, Toulouse, France Royal Dutch Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, The Netherlands Deutscher Wetterdienst, Hohenpeißenberg, Germany Institute Of Chemistry And Dynamics Of The Geosphere (ICG), FZ Jülich, Germany Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany The implementation and application of a newly developed coupled system combining ECMWF's integrated forecast system (IFS) with global chemical transport models (CTMs) is presented. The main objective of the coupled system is to enable the IFS to simulate key chemical species without the necessity to invert the complex source and sink processes such as chemical reactions, emission and deposition. Thus satellite observations of atmospheric composition can be assimilated into the IFS using its 4D-VAR algorithm. <br><br> In the coupled system, the IFS simulates only the transport of chemical species. The coupled CTM provides to the IFS the concentration tendencies due to emission injection, deposition and chemical conversion. The CTMs maintain their own transport schemes and are fed with meteorological data at hourly resolution from the IFS. The CTM used in the coupled system can be either MOZART-3, TM5 or MOCAGE. The coupling is achieved via the special-purpose OASIS4 software. <br><br> The scientific integrity of the coupled system is proven by analysing the difference between stand-alone CTM simulations and the tracer fields in the coupled IFS. The IFS concentration fields match the CTM fields for about 48 h with the biggest differences occurring in the planetary boundary layer (PBL). The coupled system is a good test bed for process-oriented comparison of the coupled CTM. As an example, the vertical structure of chemical conversion and emission injection is studied for a ten day period over Central Europe for the three CTMs. Bechtold, P., Bazile, E., Guichard, F., Mascart, P., and Richard, E.: A~mass flux convection scheme for regional and global models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127, 869–886, 2001. Beljaars, A., Bechtold, P., Kohler, M., Morcrette, J.-J., Tompkins, A., Viterbo, P., and Wedi, N.: The numerics of physical parameterization, Seminar on Recent developments in numerical methods for atmospheric and ocean modelling, 6–10 Sep, http://www.ecmwf.int/publications/library/do/references/show?id=86397, 2004. Bousserez, N., Attié, J.-L., Peuch, V.-H., Michou, M., and Pfister, G.: Evaluation of the MOCAGE chemistry and transport model during the ICARTT/ITOP experiment, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D10S42, doi:10.1029/2006JD007595, 2007. Carslaw, K S., Luo, B., Peter, T., and Clegg, S L.: Vapour pressures of H2SO4/HNO3/HBr/H2O solutions to low stratospheric temperatures, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 247–250, 1995. Engelen, R J., Serrar, S., and Chevallier, F.: Four-dimensional data assimilation of atmospheric \chemCO_2 using AIRS observations, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D03303, doi:10.1029/2008JD010739, 2009. Fortuin, J P F. and Kelder, H.: An ozone climatology based on ozonesonde and satellite measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 31709–31734, 1998. Ford, R W. and Riley, G D: FLUME coupling review, UK met-office, Exeter, 2002. Grell, G A., Peckham, S E., Schmitz, R., McKeen, S A., Frost, G J., Skamarock, W., and Eder B.: Fully coupled online chemistry within the WRF model, Atmos. Environ., 39, 37, 6957–6975, 2005. Hack, J J.: Parameterization of moist convection in the NCAR community climate model (CCM2), J. Geophys. Res., 99, 5551–5568, 1994. Hollingsworth, A., Engelen, R J., Textor, C., Benedetti, A., Boucher, O., Chevallier, F., Dethof, A., Elbern, H., Eskes, H., Flemming, J., Granier, C., Kaiser, J W., Morcrette, J.-J., Rayner, P., Peuch, V H., Rouil, L., Schultz, M G., Simmons, A J., and The GEMS Consortium: Toward a~Monitoring and Forecasting System For Atmospheric Composition: The GEMS Project, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 89, 1147–1164, 2008. Holtslag, A A. and Moeng, C.-H.: Eddy diffusivity and counter-gradient transport in the convective atmospheric boundary layer, J. Atm. Sci., 48, 1690–1698, 1991. Holtslag, A A. and Boville, B.: Local versus nonlocal boundary-layer diffusion in a~global climate model, J. Clim., 6, 1825–1842, 1993. Hortal, M. and Simmons, A J.: Use of reduced Gaussian grids in spectral models, Mon. Weather Rev., 119, 1057–1074, 1991. Houweling, S., Dentener, F., and Lelieveld, J.: The impact of non-methane hydrocarbon compounds on tropospheric photochemistry, J. Geophys. Res., 103(D9), 10673–10696, 1998. Inness, A., Flemming, J., Suttie M. and Jones, L.: GEMS data assimilation system for chemically reactive gases, Technical Memoradum No. 587, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), http://www.ecmwf.int/publications/library/do/references/show?id=89131, 2009. Josse B., Simon, P., and Peuch, V.-H.: Rn-222 global simulations with the multiscale CTM MOCAGE, Tellus, 56B, 339–356, 2004. Kaminski, J W., Neary, L., Struzewska, J., McConnell, J C., Lupu, A., Jarosz, J., Toyota, K., Gong, S L., Côté, J., Liu, X., Chance, K., and Richter, A.: GEM-AQ, an on-line global multiscale chemical weather modelling system: model description and evaluation of gas phase chemistry processes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 3255–3281, 2008. Kinnison, D E., Brasseur, G P., Walters, S., Garcia, R R., Marsh, D R., Sassi, F., Harvey, V L., Randall, C E., Emmons, L., Lamarque, J F., Hess, P. , Orlando, J J., Tie, X X. , Randel, W., Pan, L L., Gettelman, A., Granier, C., Diehl, T., Niemeier, U., and Simmons, A J.: Sensitivity of Chemical Tracers to Meteorological Parameters in the MOZART-3 Chemical Transport Model, J. Geophys. Res, 112, D03303, doi:10.1029/2008JD010739, 2007. Krol, M., Houweling, S., Bregman, B., van den Broek, M., Segers, A., van Velthoven, P., Peters, W., Dentener, F., and Bergamaschi, P.: The two-way nested global chemistry-transport zoom model TM5: algorithm and applications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 417–432, 2005. Lefèvre, F., Brasseur, G P., Folkins, I., Smith, A K., and Simon, P.: Chemistry of the 1991–1992 stratospheric winter: three dimensional model simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 8183–8195, 1994. Lin, S J. and Rood, R B.: A~fast flux form semi-Lagrangian transport scheme on the sphere, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 2046–2070, 1996. Louis, J.-F.: A~parametric model of vertical eddy-fluxes in the atmosphere, Bound. Lay. Meteor., 17, 187–202, 1979. Massart, S., Cariolle, D., and Peuch, V.-H.: Towards an improvement of the atmospheric ozone distribution and variability by assimilation of satellite data, C. R. Geosciences, 15, 1305–1310, 2005. Ménard, R., Chabrillat, S., McConnel, J., et al.: Coupled chemical-dynamical data assimilation, Final Report V3.2, ESA/ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 2007. Morcrette, J.-J., Boucher, O., Jones, L., Salmond, D., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A., Benedetti, A., Bonet, A., Kaiser, J W., Razinger, M., Schulz, M., Serrar, S., Simmons, A J., Sofiev, M., Suttie, M., Tompkins, A M., and Untch, A.: Aerosol analysis and forecast in the ECMWF Integrated Forecast System. Part I: Forward modelling, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D06206, doi:10.1029/2008JD011235, 2009. Mari, C., Jacob, D J., and Bechtold, P.: Transport and scavenging of soluble gases in a~deep convective cloud, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 22255–22267, 2000. Park, M., Randel, W. J., Emmons, L. K., and Livesey, N. J.: Transport pathways of carbon monoxide in the Asian summer monsoon diagnosed from Model of Ozone and Related Tracers (MOZART), J. Geophys. Res., 114, D08303, doi:10.1029/2008JD010621, 2009. Pozzoli L., Bey, I., Rast, J S., Schultz, M G., Stier, P., and Feichter, J.: Trace gas and aerosol interactions in the fully coupled model of aerosol-chemistry-climate ECHAM5-HAMMOZ, PART~I: Model description and insights from the spring 2001 TRACE-P experiment, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D07308, doi:10.1029/2007JD009007 2008. Randerson, J T., van der Werf, G R., Giglio, L., Collatz, G J., and Kasibhatla, P S.: Global Fire Emissions Database, Version 2 (GFEDv2). Data set, available online http://daac.ornl. gov/ from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA, idoi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/834, 2006. Rast, S., Schultz, M G., Bey, I., van Noije, T., Aghedo, A M., Brasseur, G P., Diehl, T., Esch, M., Ganzeveld, L., Kirchner, I., Kornblueh, L., Rhodin, A., Röckner, E., Schmidt, H., Schröder, S., Schulzweida, U., Stier, P., Thomas, K., and Walters, S.: Interannual variability in tropospheric ozone over the 1980-2000 period: Results from the tropospheric chemistry general circulation model ECHAM5–MOZ, J. Geophys. Res., submitted, 26 November, 2008. Russell, G L. and Lerner, J A.: A~new finite-differencing scheme for the tracer transport equation, J. Appl. Meteorol., 20, 1483–1498, 1981. Sander, S P., Friedl, R. R., Golden, D. M., et al.: Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies, Evaluation Number 14, JPL Publication 02-25, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., 2003. Sander, S P., Finlayson-Pitt, B. J, Friedl, R. R., et al.: Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies, Evaluation Number 15, JPL Publication 06-02, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, 2006. Schultz, M G., Pulles, T., Brand, R., van het Bolscher, M., and Dalsøren, S B.: A~global data set of anthropogenic \chemCO, NO_x, and NMVOC emissions for 1960–2000, data available from http://retro.enes.org/data_emissions.shtml, 2009. Singhl, H B. and Jacob, D.: Future directions: Satellite observations of tropospheric chemistry, Atmos. Environ., 34, 25, 4399–4401, 2000. Tiedtke, M A.: comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models, Mon. Weather Rev., 117(8), 1779–1800, 1989. Tilmes, S. and Zimmermann, J.: Investigation on the spatial scales of the variability in measured near-ground ozone mixing ratios, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 20, 3827–3830, 1998. Valcke, S. and Redler, R.: OASIS4 User Guide (OASIS4_0_2). PRISM Support Initiative Report, No4, available at: http://www.prism.enes.org/PAEs/coupling_IO/software_OASIS4.php#Documentation , 2006. van der Werf, G R., Randerson, J T., Giglio, L., Collatz, G J., Kasibhatla, P S., and Arellano Jr., A F.: Interannual variability in global biomass burning emissions from 1997 to 2004, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3423–3441, 2006. Williamson, D L. and Rash, P J.: Two-dimensional semi lagrangian transport with shape-preserving interpolation, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 102–129, 1989. Zhang, G J. and McFarlane, N A.: Sensitivity of climate simulations to the parameterization of cumulus convection in the Canadian climate centre general circulation model, Atmos. Ocean, 33, 407–446, 1995. Zhang, Y.: Online-coupled meteorology and chemistry models: history, current status, and outlook, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2895–2932, 2008.