Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
doi:10.5194/gmd-2016-201
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Model description paper
13 Sep 2016
Review status
A revision of this discussion paper was accepted for the journal Geoscientific Model Development (GMD) and is expected to appear here in due course.
Evaluation of oceanic and atmospheric trajectory schemes in the TRACMASS trajectory model v6.0
Kristofer Döös1, Bror Jönsson2, and Joakim Kjellsson3 1Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
2Department of Geosciences, Princeton University, Guyot Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
3Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford, UK
Abstract. Two different trajectory schemes for oceanic and atmospheric general circulation models are compared in two different experiments. The theories of the two trajectory schemes are presented showing the differential equations they solve and why they are mass conserving. One scheme assumes that the velocity fields are stationary for a limited period of time and solves the trajectory path from a differential equation only as a function of space, i.e. "stepwise stationary". The second scheme uses a continuous linear interpolation of the fields in time and solves the trajectory path from a differential equation as a function of both space and time, i.e. "time-dependent". A special case of the "stepwise-stationary" scheme, when velocities are assumed constant between GCM outputs, is also considered, named "fixed GCM time step". The trajectory schemes are tested "off-line", i.e. using the already integrated and stored velocity fields from a GCM. The first comparison of the schemes uses trajectories calculated using the velocity fields from an eddy-resolving ocean general circulation model in the Agulhas region. The second comparison uses trajectories calculated using the wind fields from an atmospheric reanalysis. The study shows that using the "time-dependent" scheme over the "stepwise-stationary" scheme greatly improves accuracy with only a small increase in computational time. It is also found that with decreasing time steps the "stepwise-stationary" scheme becomes more accurate but at increased computational cost. The "time-dependent" scheme is therefore preferred over the "stepwise-stationary" scheme. However, when averaging over large ensembles of trajectories the two schemes are comparable, as intrinsic variability dominates over numerical errors. The "fixed GCM time step" is found to be less accurate than the "stepwise-stationary" scheme, even when considering averages over large ensembles.

Citation: Döös, K., Jönsson, B., and Kjellsson, J.: Evaluation of oceanic and atmospheric trajectory schemes in the TRACMASS trajectory model v6.0, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., doi:10.5194/gmd-2016-201, in review, 2016.
Kristofer Döös et al.
Kristofer Döös et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 216 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
181 29 6 216 4 5

Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Sep 2016)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Sep 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 216 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

Thereof 215 with geography defined and 1 with unknown origin.

Country # Views %
  • 1

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 23 Mar 2017
Publications Copernicus
Download
Share