<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/xml/rss1_0.xml"><title>GMDD - Latest Articles</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/</link><description>Geoscientific Model Development Discussions Latest Articles</description><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li resource="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/5/189/2012/" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/5/149/2012/" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/5/119/2012/" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/5/67/2012/" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/5/1/2012/" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3691/2011/" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3623/2011/" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3599/2011/" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3485/2011/" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3437/2011/" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3363/2011/" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3339/2011/" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3313/2011/" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3295/2011/" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3185/2011/" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3161/2011/" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3127/2011/" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3067/2011/" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3047/2011/" /><rdf:li resource="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3013/2011/" /></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/5/189/2012/"><title>A standard test case suite for two-dimensional linear transport on the sphere</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/5/189/2012/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;A standard test case suite for two-dimensional linear transport on the sphere&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 5, 189-228, 2012&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): P. H. Lauritzen, W. C. Skamarock, M. J. Prather, and M. A. Taylor&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is the purpose of this paper to propose a standard test case suite
      for two-dimensional transport schemes on the sphere intended to be
      used for model development and facilitating scheme
      intercomparison. The test cases are designed to assess important
      aspects of accuracy in geophysical fluid dynamics such as numerical
      order of convergence, &quot;minimal&quot; resolution, the ability of the
      transport scheme to preserve filaments, transport &quot;rough&quot;
      distributions, and to preserve pre-existing functional relations
      between species/tracers under challenging flow conditions.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
      The experiments are designed to be easy to set up. They are specified
      in terms of two analytical wind fields (one non-divergent and one
      divergent) and four analytical initial conditions (varying from smooth
      to discontinuous). Both conventional error norms as well as novel
      mixing and filament preservation diagnostics are used that are easy to
      implement. The experiments pose different challenges for the range of
      transport approaches from Lagrangian to Eulerian. The mixing and
      filament preservation diagnostics do not require an
      analytical/reference solution which is in contrast to standard error
      norms where a &quot;true&quot; solution is needed. Results using the CSLAM
      (Conservative Semi-Lagrangian Multi-tracer) scheme on the cubed-sphere
      are presented for reference and illustrative purposes.</description><dc:date>2012-01-30T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/5/149/2012/"><title>Implementation and evaluation of online gas-phase chemistry within a regional climate model (RegCM-CHEM4)</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/5/149/2012/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Implementation and evaluation of online gas-phase chemistry within a regional climate model (RegCM-CHEM4)&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 5, 149-188, 2012&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): A. K. Shalaby, A. S. Zakey, A. B. Tawfik, F. Solmon, F. Giorgi, F. Stordal, S. Sillman, R. A. Zaveri, and A. L. Steiner&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The RegCM-CHEM4 is a new online climate-chemistry model based on the
      International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) regional climate
      model (RegCM4). Tropospheric gas-phase chemistry is integrated into
      the climate model using the condensed version of the Carbon Bond
      Mechanism (CBM-Z; Zaveri and Peters, 1999) with a fast solver based on
      radical balances. We evaluate the model over Continental Europe for
      two different time scales: (1) an event-based analysis of the ozone
      episode associated with the heat wave of August 2003 and (2)
      a climatological analysis of a six-year simulation (2000–2005). For
      the episode analysis, model simulations show good agreement with
      European Monitoring and Evaluation Program (EMEP) observations of
      hourly ozone over different regions in Europe and capture ozone
      concentrations during and after the August 2003 heat wave event. For
      long-term climate simulations, the model captures the seasonal cycle
      of ozone concentrations with some over prediction of ozone
      concentrations in non-heat wave summers. Overall, the ozone and ozone
      precursor evaluation shows the feasibility of using RegCM-CHEM4 for
      decadal-length simulations of chemistry-climate interactions.</description><dc:date>2012-01-17T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/5/119/2012/"><title>Pre-industrial and mid-Pliocene simulations with NorESM-L</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/5/119/2012/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Pre-industrial and mid-Pliocene simulations with NorESM-L&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 5, 119-148, 2012&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): Z. S. Zhang, K. Nisancioglu, M. Bentsen, J. Tjiputra, I. Bethke, Q. Yan, B. Risebrobakken, C. Andersson, and E. Jansen&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The mid-Pliocene period (3.3 to 3.0 Ma) is known as a warm climate with
atmospheric greenhouse gas levels similar to the present. As the climate at
this time was in equilibrium with the greenhouse forcing, it is a valuable
test case to better understand the long term response to high levels of
atmospheric greenhouse gases. In this study, we use the low resolution
version of the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM-L) to simulate the
pre-industrial and the mid-Pliocene climate. Comparison of the simulation
with observations demonstrates that NorESM-L simulates a realistic
pre-industrial climate. The simulated mid-Pliocene global mean surface air
temperature is 16.7 °C, which is 3.2 °C warmer than the
pre-industrial. The simulated mid-Pliocene global mean sea surface
temperature is 19.1 °C, which is 2.0 °C warmer than the
pre-industrial. The warming is relatively uniform globally, except for a
strong amplification at high latitudes.</description><dc:date>2012-01-13T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/5/67/2012/"><title>Carbon-nitrogen feedbacks in the UVic ESCM</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/5/67/2012/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Carbon-nitrogen feedbacks in the UVic ESCM&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 5, 67-118, 2012&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): R. Wania, K. J. Meissner, M. Eby, V. Arora, I. Ross, and A. J. Weaver&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A representation of the terrestrial nitrogen cycle is introduced into
      the UVic Earth System Climate Model (UVic ESCM). The UVic ESCM now
      contains five terrestrial carbon pools and seven terrestrial nitrogen
      pools: soil, litter, leaves, stem and roots for both elements and
      ammonium and nitrate in the soil for nitrogen.  Nitrogen cycles
      through plant tissue, litter, soil and the mineral pools before being
      taken up again by the plant.  Biological N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; fixation and nitrogen
      deposition represent the external input and loss from the plant-soil
      system can occur via leaching.  Simulated carbon and nitrogen pools
      and fluxes are in the range of other models and data.  Gross primary
      production (GPP) for the 1990s in the CN-coupled version is
      129.6 Pg C a&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt; and net C uptake is 0.83 Pg C a&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;,
      whereas the C-only version results in a GPP of 133.1 Pg C a&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;
      and a net C uptake of 1.57 Pg C a&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;. At the end of a transient
      experiment for the years 1800–2000, where temperature is held
      constant but CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; fertilisation for vegetation is allowed to happen,
      the CN-coupled version shows an enhanced net C uptake of
      1.05 Pg C a&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;, whereas in the experiment where CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; is held
      constant and temperature is transient the land turns into a C source
      of 0.60 Pg C a&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt; by the 1990s.  The arithmetic sum of the
      temperature and CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; effects results in 0.45 Pg C a&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;, which
      is 0.38 Pg C a&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt; lower than seen in the fully forced model,
      suggesting a strong non-linearity in the CN-coupled version.
      Anthropogenic N deposition has a positive effect on Net Ecosystem
      Production of 0.35 Pg C a&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;. Overall, the UVic CN-coupled
      version shows similar characteristics in terms of C and N pools and
      fluxes to other CN-coupled Earth System Models.</description><dc:date>2012-01-10T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/5/1/2012/"><title>Simulations over South Asia using the weather research and forecasting model with chemistry  (WRF-Chem): chemistry evaluation and initial results</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/5/1/2012/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Simulations over South Asia using the weather research and forecasting model with chemistry  (WRF-Chem): chemistry evaluation and initial results&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 5, 1-66, 2012&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): R. Kumar, M. Naja, G. G. Pfister, M. C. Barth, C. Wiedinmyer, and G. P. Brasseur&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This study presents annual simulations of tropospheric ozone and related species made for the
  first time using the WRF-Chem model over South Asia for the year 2008. The model simulated ozone,
  CO, and NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; are evaluated against ground-based, balloon-borne and satellite-borne (TES,
  OMI and MOPITT) observations. The comparison of model results with surface ozone observations from
  seven sites and CO and NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; observations from three sites, indicate the model's ability in
  reproducing seasonal variations of ozone and CO, but show some differences in NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;. The
  modeled vertical ozone distribution agrees well with the ozone soundings data from two Indian
  sites. The vertical distributions of TES ozone and MOPITT CO are generally well reproduced, but
  the model underestimates TES ozone, OMI tropospheric column NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; and MOPITT total column CO
  retrievals during all the months except MOPITT retrievals during August–January. Largest
  differences between modeled and satellite retrieved quantities are found during spring when
  intense biomass burning activity occurs in this region. The evaluation results indicate large
  uncertainties in anthropogenic and biomass burning emission estimates, especially for
  NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;. The model results indicate clear regional differences in the seasonality of surface
  ozone over South Asia with estimated net ozone production during daytime (11:30–15:30 h) over
  inland regions of 0–5 ppbv h&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt; during all seasons and of 0–2 ppbv h&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt; over marine
  regions during outflow periods. The model results indicate that ozone production in this region is
  mostly NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;-limited.  This study shows that WRF-Chem model captures many important features
  of the observations and gives confidence to using the model for understanding the spatio-temporal
  variability of ozone over South Asia. However, improvements of South Asian emission inventories
  and simulations at finer model resolution, especially over the complex Himalayan terrain in
  Northern India, are also essential for accurately simulating ozone in this region.</description><dc:date>2012-01-03T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3691/2011/"><title>&quot;Gtool5&quot;: a Fortran90 library of input/output interfaces for self-descriptive multi-dimensional numerical data</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3691/2011/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;&quot;Gtool5&quot;: a Fortran90 library of input/output interfaces for self-descriptive multi-dimensional numerical data&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 4, 3691-3707, 2011&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): M. Ishiwatari, E. Toyoda, Y. Morikawa, S. Takehiro, Y. Sasaki, S. Nishizawa, M. Odaka, N. Otobe, Y. O. Takahashi, K. Nakajima, T. Horinouchi, M. Shiotani, Y.-Y. Hayashi, and Gtool development group&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Fortran90 input/output library, &quot;gtool5&quot;, is developed for use with numerical
  simulation models in the fields of Earth and planetary sciences.
  The use of this library will simplify implementation of input/output operations
  into program code in a consolidated form
  independent of the size and complexity of the software and data.
  The library also enables simple specification of the metadata
  needed for post-processing and visualization of the data.
  These aspects improve
  the readability of simulation code,
  which
  facilitates the simultaneous performance of multiple numerical experiments
  with different software
  and efficiency in examining and comparing the numerical results.
  The library is expected to provide a common software platform
  to reinforce research on, for instance,
  the atmosphere and ocean,
  where a close combination of
  multiple simulation models with a wide variety of complexity
  of physics implementations from massive
  climate models to simple geophysical fluid dynamics models
  is required.</description><dc:date>2011-12-19T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3623/2011/"><title>Evaluation of the sectional aerosol microphysics module SALSA implementation in ECHAM5-HAM aerosol-climate model</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3623/2011/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Evaluation of the sectional aerosol microphysics module SALSA implementation in ECHAM5-HAM aerosol-climate model&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 4, 3623-3690, 2011&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): T. Bergman, V.-M. Kerminen, H. Korhonen, K. J. Lehtinen, R. Makkonen, A. Arola, T. Mielonen, S. Romakkaniemi, M. Kulmala, and H. Kokkola&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We present the implementation and evaluation of a sectional aerosol
microphysics model SALSA within the aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM. This
aerosol microphysics module has been designed to be flexible and
computationally efficient so that it can be implemented in regional or global
scale models. The computational efficiency has been achieved by keeping the
number of variables needed to describe the size and composition distribution
to the minimum. The aerosol size distribution is described using 20 size
sections with 10 size sections in size space which cover diameters ranging
from 3 nm to 10 μm divided to three subranges each having distinct
optimised process and compound selection.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The ability of the module to describe the global aerosol properties was
evaluated by comparison against (1) measured continental and marine size
distributions, (2) observed variability of continental modal number
concentrations, (3) measured sulphate, organic carbon, black carbon and sea
salt mass concentrations, (4) observations of AOD and other aerosol optical
properties from satellites and AERONET network, (5) global aerosol budgets
and concentrations from previous model studies, and (6) model results using
M7 which is the default aerosol microphysics module in ECHAM5-HAM.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

The evaluation shows that the global aerosol properties can be reproduced
reasonably well using the coarse resolution of 10 size sections in size
space. The simulated global aerosol budgets are within the range of previous
studies. Surface concentrations of sea salt, sulphate and carbonaceous
species have an annual mean within a factor of five of the observations,
while the simulated sea salt concentrations reproduce the observations less
accurately and show high variability. Regionally, AOD is in relatively good
agreement with the observations (within a factor of two). At mid-latitudes
the observed AOD is captured well, while at high-latitudes as well as in some
polluted and dust regions the modeled AOD is significantly lower than the
observed. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Regarding the most investigated aerosol properties, the
performances of SALSA and the modal aerosol module M7 against observations
are comparable. However, SALSA reproduces the observed number concentrations
and the size distributions of CCN sized particles much more accurately than
M7, and is therefore a good choice for aerosol-cloud interaction studies in
global models. Our study also shows that when including activation type
nucleation process in the boundary layer, the modeled concentrations of
particles under 50 nm in diameter are reproduced much better compared to
when only binary nucleation is assumed.</description><dc:date>2011-12-14T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3599/2011/"><title>The ACCENT-protocol: a framework for benchmarking and model evaluation</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3599/2011/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;The ACCENT-protocol: a framework for benchmarking and model evaluation&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 4, 3599-3621, 2011&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): V. Grewe, N. Moussiopoulos, P. Builtjes, C. Borrego, I. S. A. Isaksen, and A. Volz-Thomas&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We summarise results from a workshop on
&quot;Model Benchmarking and Quality Assurance&quot; of the EU-Network of Excellence ACCENT,
including results from other activities (e.g. COST Action 732) and publications.
A formalised evaluation protocol is presented, i.e. a generic formalism describing the procedure how
to perform a model evaluation. This includes eight steps and examples from global model applications
are given for illustration.
The first and important step is concerning the purpose of the model application,
i.e. the addressed underlying scientific or
political question. We give examples to demonstrate that there is
no model evaluation per se, i.e. without a focused purpose. Model evaluation is testing, whether a
model is fit for its purpose. The following steps are deduced from the purpose and
include model requirements, input data,
key processes and quantities, benchmark data, quality indicators, sensitivities, as well as benchmarking and grading.
We define &quot;benchmarking&quot; as the process of comparing the model output against either observational data or high fidelity model
data, i.e. benchmark data.
Special focus is given to the uncertainties, e.g. in observational data, which have the potential to
lead to wrong conclusions in the model evaluation if not considered carefully.</description><dc:date>2011-12-13T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3485/2011/"><title>Toward a minimal representation of aerosol direct and indirect effects: model description and evaluation</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3485/2011/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Toward a minimal representation of aerosol direct and indirect effects: model description and evaluation&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 4, 3485-3598, 2011&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): X. Liu, R. C. Easter, S. J. Ghan, R. Zaveri, P. Rasch, X. Shi, J.-F. Lamarque, A. Gettelman, H. Morrison, F. Vitt, A. Conley, S. Park, R. Neale, C. Hannay, A. M. L. Ekman, P. Hess, N. Mahowald, W. Collins, M. J. Iacono, C. S. Bretherton, M. G. Flanner, and D. Mitchell&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A modal aerosol module (MAM) has been developed for the Community
      Atmosphere Model version 5 (CAM5), the atmospheric component of the
      Community Earth System Model version 1 (CESM1). MAM is capable of
      simulating the aerosol size distribution and both internal and
      external mixing between aerosol components, treating numerous
      complicated aerosol processes and aerosol physical, chemical and
      optical properties in a physically based manner. Two MAM versions were
      developed: a more complete version with seven lognormal modes (MAM7),
      and a version with three lognormal modes (MAM3) for the purpose of
      long-term (decades to centuries) simulations. Major approximations in
      MAM3 include assuming immediate mixing of primary organic matter (POM)
      and black carbon (BC) with other aerosol components, merging of the
      MAM7 fine dust and fine sea salt modes into the accumulation mode,
      merging of the MAM7 coarse dust and coarse sea salt modes into the
      single coarse mode, and neglecting the explicit treatment of ammonia
      and ammonium cycles.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
      Simulated sulfate and secondary organic aerosol (SOA) mass
      concentrations are remarkably similar between MAM3 and MAM7 as most
      (~90%) of these aerosol species are in the accumulation
      mode. Differences of POM and BC concentrations between MAM3 and MAM7
      are also small (mostly within 10%) because of the assumed
      hygroscopic nature of POM, so that much of the freshly emitted POM and
      BC is wet-removed before mixing internally with soluble aerosol
      species. Sensitivity tests with the POM assumed to be hydrophobic and
      with slower aging increase the POM and BC concentrations, especially
      at high latitudes (by several times). The mineral dust global burden
      differs by 10% and sea salt burden by 30–40% between MAM3
      and MAM7 mainly due to the different size ranges for dust and sea salt
      modes and different standard deviations of the log-normal size
      distribution for sea salt modes between MAM3 and MAM7. The model is
      able to qualitatively capture the observed geographical and temporal
      variations of aerosol mass and number concentrations, size
      distributions, and aerosol optical properties. However, there are
      noticeable biases, e.g., simulated sulfate and mineral dust
      concentrations at surface over the oceans are too low. Simulated BC
      concentrations are significantly lower than measurements in the
      Arctic. There is a low bias in modeled aerosol optical depth on the
      global scale, especially in the developing countries. There biases in
      aerosol simulations clearly indicate the need for improvements of
      aerosol processes (e.g., emission fluxes of anthropogenic aerosols and
      precursor gases in developing countries, boundary layer nucleation)
      and properties (e.g., primary aerosol emission size, POM
      hygroscopicity). In addition the critical role of cloud properties
      (e.g., liquid water content, cloud fraction) responsible for the wet
      scavenging of aerosol is highlighted.</description><dc:date>2011-12-12T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3437/2011/"><title>Coupling a new turbulence parametrization to RegCM adds realistic stratocumulus clouds</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3437/2011/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Coupling a new turbulence parametrization to RegCM adds realistic stratocumulus clouds&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 4, 3437-3484, 2011&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): T. A. O'Brien, P. Y. Chuang, L. C. Sloan, I. C. Faloona, and D. L. Rossiter&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To model stratocumulus clouds in the regional climate model, RegCM4.1, the University of
  Washington (UW) turbulence parametrization has been coupled to RegCM.  We describe improvements in
  RegCM's coastal and near-coastal climatology, including improvements in the representation of
  stratiform clouds.  By comparing output from a 27-yr (1982–2009) simulation of the climate of
  Western North America to a wide variety of observational data (station data, satellite data, and
  aircraft in situ data), we show the following: (1) RegCM-UW is appropriate for use in general
  regional climate studies, and (2) the UW model distinctly improves the representation of the
  marine boundary layer in RegCM.  These model-data comparisons also show that RegCM-UW has slight
  cold bias, a (wet) precipitation bias, a systematic low bias in the vertically-integrated liquid
  water content near the coast, and a high bias in the fractional cloud coverage. The model
  represents well the diurnal, monthly, and interannual variability in low clouds.  These results
  show RegCM-UW as a nascent mesoscale stratocumulus model that is appropriate for stratocumulus
  investigations at scales ranging from hourly to decadal.  The source code for RegCM-UW is publicly
  available, under the GNU license, through the International Centre for Theoretical Physics.</description><dc:date>2011-12-09T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3363/2011/"><title>The CSIRO Mk3L climate system model version 1.0 &amp;ndash; Part 2: Response to external forcings</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3363/2011/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;The CSIRO Mk3L climate system model version 1.0 &amp;ndash; Part 2: Response to external forcings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 4, 3363-3435, 2011&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): S. J. Phipps, L. D. Rotstayn, H. B. Gordon, J. L. Roberts, A. C. Hirst, and W. F. Budd&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CSIRO Mk3L climate system model is a coupled general circulation model, designed primarily for
  millennial-scale climate simulation and palaeoclimate research. Mk3L includes components which
  describe the atmosphere, ocean, sea ice and land surface, and combines computational efficiency
  with a stable and realistic control climatology. It is freely available to the research
  community. This paper evaluates the response of the model to external forcings which correspond to
  past and future changes in the climate system.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
  A simulation of the mid-Holocene climate is performed, in which changes in the seasonal and
  meridional distribution of incoming solar radiation are imposed. Mk3L correctly simulates
  increased summer temperatures at northern mid-latitudes and cooling in the tropics. However, it is
  unable to capture some of the regional-scale features of the mid-Holocene climate, with the
  precipitation over Northern Africa being deficient. The model simulates a reduction of between
  7 and 15% in the amplitude of El Niño-Southern Oscillation, a smaller decrease than
  that implied by the palaeoclimate record. However, the realism of the simulated ENSO is limited by
  the model's relatively coarse spatial resolution.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
  Transient simulations of the late Holocene climate are then performed.  The evolving distribution
  of insolation is imposed, and an acceleration technique is applied and assessed. The model
  successfully captures the temperature changes in each hemisphere and the upward trend in ENSO
  variability. However, the lack of a dynamic vegetation scheme does not allow it to simulate an
  abrupt desertification of the Sahara.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
  To assess the response of Mk3L to other forcings, transient simulations of the last millennium are
  performed. Changes in solar irradiance, atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations and volcanic
  emissions are applied to the model. The model is again broadly successful at simulating
  larger-scale changes in the climate system. Both the magnitude and the spatial pattern of the
  simulated 20th century warming are consistent with observations. However, the model underestimates
  the magnitude of the relative warmth associated with the Mediaeval Climate Anomaly.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
  Finally, three transient simulations are performed, in which the atmospheric CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;
  concentration is stabilised at two, three and four times the pre-industrial value. All three
  simulations exhibit ongoing surface warming, reduced sea ice cover, and a  reduction in the rate of
  North Atlantic Deep Water formation followed by its gradual recovery. Antarctic Bottom Water
  formation ceases, with the shutdown being permanent for a trebling and quadrupling of the
  CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; concentration. The transient and equilibrium climate sensitivities of the model are
  determined. The short-term transient response to a  doubling of the CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; concentration at
  1% per year is a warming of 1.5 K, while the long-term equilibrium response is a warming of
  at least 3.9 K.</description><dc:date>2011-12-07T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3339/2011/"><title>Set-up and preliminary results of mid-Pliocene climate simulations with  CAM3.1</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3339/2011/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Set-up and preliminary results of mid-Pliocene climate simulations with  CAM3.1&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 4, 3339-3361, 2011&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): Q. Yan, Z. Zhang, H. Wang, Y. Gao, and W. Zheng&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The mid-Pliocene warm period (~3.3 to 3.0 Ma BP) is
      a potential analogue for future climate under global
      warming. In this study, we use an atmospheric general
      circulation model (AGCM) called CAM3.1 to simulate the
      mid-Pliocene climate with the PRISM3D boundary conditions. The
      simulations show that the global annual mean surface air
      temperature (SAT) increases by 2.0 &amp;deg;C in the
      mid-Pliocene compared with the pre-industrial temperature. The
      greatest warming mainly occurs in the high latitudes of both
      hemispheres, with little change in SAT at low latitudes. The
      equator-to-pole SAT gradient is reduced in the mid-Pliocene
      simulation. The annual mean precipitation is enhanced by
      3.6% of the pre-industrial value. However, the changes in
      precipitation are greater in low latitudes than high
      latitudes.</description><dc:date>2011-12-05T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3313/2011/"><title>Supersaturation calculation in large eddy simulation models for prediction of the droplet number concentration</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3313/2011/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Supersaturation calculation in large eddy simulation models for prediction of the droplet number concentration&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 4, 3313-3337, 2011&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): O. Thouron, J.-L. Brenguier, and F. Burnet&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A new parameterization scheme is described for calculation of
      supersaturation in LES models that specifically aims at the simulation
      of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activation and prediction of the
      droplet number concentration. The scheme is tested against current
      parameterizations in the framework of the Meso-NH LES model. It is
      shown that the saturation adjustment scheme based on parameterizations
      of CCN activation in a convective updraft over estimates the droplet
      concentration in the cloud core while it cannot simulate cloud top
      supersaturation production due to mixing between cloudy and clear
      air. A supersaturation diagnostic scheme mitigates these artefacts by
      accounting for the presence of already condensed water in the cloud
      core but it is too sensitive to supersaturation fluctuations at cloud
      top and produces spurious CCN activation during cloud top mixing. The
      proposed pseudo-prognostic scheme shows performance similar to the
      diagnostic one in the cloud core but significantly mitigates CCN
      activation at cloud top.</description><dc:date>2011-12-05T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3295/2011/"><title>Influence of parallel computational uncertainty on simulations of the  Coupled General Climate Model</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3295/2011/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Influence of parallel computational uncertainty on simulations of the  Coupled General Climate Model&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 4, 3295-3312, 2011&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): Z. Song, F. Qiao, X. Lei, and C. Wang&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This paper investigates the impact of the parallel computational
      uncertainty on climate simulations using the Community Climate System
      Model Version 3 (CCSM3). A series of sensitivity experiments have been
      conducted and the analyses are focused on the Global and Nino3.4 sea
      surface temperatures. It is shown that the amplitude of the deviation
      induced by the parallel computational uncertainty is the same order as
      that of the climate system change. However, the ensemble mean method
      can reduce the influence and the ensemble member number of 15 is
      enough to ignore simulated errors. For climatology, the influence can
      be ignored when the climatological mean is calculated by using more
      than 30-yr simulations. It is also found that the parallel
      computational uncertainty has no effect on the simulated periods of
      climate variability such as ENSO. Finally, it is suggested that the
      influence of the parallel computational uncertainty on Coupled General
      Climate Models (CGCMs) can be a quality standard or a metric for
      developing CGCMs.</description><dc:date>2011-11-28T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3185/2011/"><title>A contrail cirrus prediction model</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3185/2011/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;A contrail cirrus prediction model&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 4, 3185-3293, 2011&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): U. Schumann&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A new model to simulate and predict the properties of a large ensemble of contrails as a
function of given air traffic and meteorology is described.
The model is designed for approximate prediction of contrail cirrus cover and
analysis of contrail climate impact, e.g. within aviation system optimization processes.
The model simulates the full contrail life-cycle.
Contrail segments form between waypoints of individual aircraft tracks
in sufficiently cold and humid air masses. The initial contrail properties depend on the aircraft.
The advection and evolution of the contrails is followed with
a Lagrangian Gaussian plume model. Mixing and bulk cloud processes are treated quasi analytically or
with an effective numerical scheme.
Contrails disappear when the bulk ice content is sublimating or precipitating.
The model has been implemented in a &quot;Contrail Cirrus Prediction Tool&quot; (CoCiP).
This paper describes the model assumptions, the equations for individual contrails,
and the analysis-method for contrail-cirrus cover derived from the optical depth of the ensemble of contrails
and background cirrus.
The model has been applied for a case study and compared to the results of other models and in-situ contrail
measurements.
The simple model reproduces a considerable part of observed contrail properties.
Mid-aged contrails provide the largest contributions to the product of optical depth and contrail width,
 important for climate impact.</description><dc:date>2011-11-28T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3161/2011/"><title>Wavelet-based spatial comparison technique for analysing and evaluating two-dimensional geophysical model fields</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3161/2011/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Wavelet-based spatial comparison technique for analysing and evaluating two-dimensional geophysical model fields&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 4, 3161-3183, 2011&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): S. Saux Picart, M. Butenschön, and J. D. Shutler&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Complex numerical models of the Earth's environment, based around 3-D
or 4-D time and space domains are routinely used for applications
including climate predictions, weather forecasts, fishery management
and environmental impact assessments.  Quantitatively assessing the
ability of these models to accurately reproduce geographical patterns
at a range of spatial and temporal scales has always been a difficult
problem to address. However, this is crucial if we are to rely on
these models for decision making.  Satellite data are potentially the
only observational dataset able to cover the large spatial domains
analysed by many types of geophysical models.  Consequently optical
wavelength satellite data is beginning to be used to evaluate model
hindcast fields of terrestrial and marine environments. However, these
satellite data invariably contain regions of occluded or missing data
due to clouds, further complicating or impacting on any comparisons
with the model.  A methodology has recently been developed to evaluate
precipitation forecasts using radar observations.  It allows model
skill to be evaluated at a range of spatial scales and rain
intensities.  Here we extend the original method to allow its generic
application to a range of continuous and discontinuous geophysical
data fields, and therefore allowing its use with optical satellite
data. This is achieved through two major improvements to the original
method: (i) all thresholds are determined based on the statistical
distribution of the input data, so no a priori knowledge about the
model fields being analysed is required and (ii) occluded data can be
analysed without impacting on the metric results. The method can be
used to assess a model's ability to simulate geographical patterns
over a range of spatial scales.  We illustrate how the method provides
a compact and concise way of visualising the degree of agreement
between spatial features in two datasets. The application of the new
method, its handling of bias and occlusion and the advantages of the
novel method are demonstrated through analyzing model fields from
a marine ecosystem model.</description><dc:date>2011-11-24T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3127/2011/"><title>Mass-flux subgrid-scale parameterization in analogy with multi-component flows: a formulation towards scale independence</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3127/2011/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Mass-flux subgrid-scale parameterization in analogy with multi-component flows: a formulation towards scale independence&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 4, 3127-3160, 2011&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): J.-I. Yano&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The mass-flux parameterization formulation is generalized by
      taking an analogy of the large-scale atmospheric flow with
      multi-component flows. This generalization permits to include
      any subgrid-scale variability into the mass-flux
      parameterization. Those include stratiform clouds as well as
      cold pools in the boundary layer.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
      An important finding under the present formulation is that the
      subgrid-scale quantities are advected by the velocities
      characteristic of given subgrid-scale components
      (subcomponent flows), rather than by the large-scale flows as
      simply defined by grid-box average.  This formulation, as
      a result, ensures the lateral interaction of subgrid-scale
      variability crossing the grid boxes, which are missing in the
      current parameterizations, and leading to a reduction of the
      grid-size dependence in its performance.  It is shown that
      the subcomponent flows are driven by subcomponent pressure
      gradients. The formulation, as a result, furthermore includes
      a self-contained description of subgrid-scale momentum
      transport.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
      The formulation is applicable to a situation in which the
      scale separation is still satisfied, but fractional areas
      occupied by individual subgrid-scale components are no longer
      small.  A complete formulation is presented and various
      implementation issues are discussed. The present formulation
      is also expected to alleviate problems arising from increasing
      resolutions of operational forecast models without invoking
      more extensive overhaul of parameterizations.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
      The main purpose of the present paper is to appeal the
      importance of this new possibility suggested herein to the
      numerical weather forecast community with implications for the
      other parameteizations (cloud fraction, mesoscale
      organization) as well as resolution-dependence of
      parameterizations.</description><dc:date>2011-11-24T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3067/2011/"><title>Simulations over South Asia using the Weather Research and Forecasting model with Chemistry (WRF-Chem): set-up and meteorological evaluation</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3067/2011/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Simulations over South Asia using the Weather Research and Forecasting model with Chemistry (WRF-Chem): set-up and meteorological evaluation&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 4, 3067-3125, 2011&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): R. Kumar, M. Naja, G. G. Pfister, M. C. Barth, and G. P. Brasseur&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The configuration and evaluation of the meteorology is presented for
simulations over the South Asian region using the Weather Research and
Forecasting model coupled with Chemistry (WRF-Chem). Temperature, water
vapor, dew point temperature, zonal and meridional wind components,
precipitation and tropopause pressure are evaluated against radiosonde and
satellite-borne (AIRS and TRMM) observations along with NCEP/NCAR reanalysis
fields for the year 2008. Chemical fields, with focus on tropospheric ozone,
are evaluated in a separate paper. The spatial and temporal variability in
meteorological variables is well simulated by the model with temperature,
dew point temperature and precipitation showing higher values during
summer/monsoon and lower during winter. The index of agreement for all the
parameters is estimated to be greater than 0.6 indicating that WRF-Chem is
capable of simulating the variations around the observed mean. The mean bias
(MB) and root mean square error (RMSE) in modeled temperature, water vapor
and wind components show an increasing tendency with altitude. MB and RMSE
values are within &amp;plusmn;2 K and 1–4 K for temperature, 30% and 20–65%
for water vapor and 1.6 m s&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt; and 5.1 m s&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt; for wind components. The
spatio-temporal variability of precipitation is also reproduced reasonably
well by the model but the model overestimates precipitation in summer and
underestimates precipitation during other seasons. Such a behavior of
modeled precipitation is in agreement with previous studies on South Asian
monsoon. The comparison with radiosonde observations indicates a relatively
better model performance for inland sites as compared to coastal and island
sites. The MB and RMSE in tropopause pressure are estimated to be less than
25 hPa. Sensitivity simulations show that biases in meteorological
simulations can introduce errors of &amp;plusmn;(10–25%) in simulations of
tropospheric ozone, CO and NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;. Nevertheless, a comparison of
statistical metrics with benchmarks indicates that the model simulated
meteorology is of sufficient quality for use in chemistry simulations.</description><dc:date>2011-11-22T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3047/2011/"><title>The FAMOUS climate model (versions XFXWB and XFHCC): description update to version XDBUA</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3047/2011/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;The FAMOUS climate model (versions XFXWB and XFHCC): description update to version XDBUA&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 4, 3047-3065, 2011&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): R. S. Smith&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FAMOUS is an ocean-atmosphere general circulation model of low resolution,
   based on version 4.5 of the UK MetOffice Unified Model. Here we update the
    model description to account for changes in the model as it is used in the
    CMIP5 EMIC model intercomparison project (EMICmip) and a number of other
    studies. Most of these changes correct errors found in the code. The
    EMICmip version of the model (XFXWB) has a better-conserved water budget
    and additional cooling in some high latitude areas, but otherwise has a
    similar climatology to previous versions of FAMOUS. A variant of XFXWB
    is also described, with changes to the dynamics at the top of the model
    which improve the model climatology (XFHCC).</description><dc:date>2011-11-22T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3013/2011/"><title>Detection, tracking and event localization of interesting features in 4-D atmospheric data</title><link>http://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/4/3013/2011/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;Detection, tracking and event localization of interesting features in 4-D atmospheric data&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 4, 3013-3045, 2011&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Author(s): S. Limbach, E. Schömer, and H. Wernli&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We introduce a novel algorithm for the efficient detection and tracking of interesting features in
  spatial-temporal atmospheric data, as well as for the precise localization of the occurring
  genesis, lysis, merging and splitting events. The algorithm is based on the well-known region
  growing segmentation method. We extended the basic idea towards the analysis of the complete 4-D
  dataset, identifying segments representing the spatial features and their development over
  time. Each segment consists of one set of distinct 3-D features per time step. The algorithm keeps
  track of the successors of each 3-D feature, constructing the so-called event graph of each
  segment. The precise localization of the splitting events is based on a search for all grid points
  inside the initial 3-D feature which have a similar distance to all successive 3-D features of the
  next time step. The merging event is localized analogously considering inverted direction of
  time. We tested the implementation on a four-dimensional field of wind speed data from European
  Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) analyses and computed a climatology of
  upper-tropospheric jet streams and their events. We compare our results with a previous
  climatology, investigate the statistical distribution of the merging and splitting events, and
  illustrate the meteorological significance of the jet splitting events with a case study. A brief
  outlook is given on additional potential applications of the 4-D data segmentation technique.</description><dc:date>2011-11-17T00:00:00+01:00</dc:date></item></rdf:RDF>
