Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2016-216
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Model evaluation paper
12 Oct 2016
Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Bayesian integration of flux tower data into process-based simulator for quantifying uncertainty in simulated output
Rahul Raj, Nicholas A.S. Hamm, Christiaan van der Tol, and Alfred Stein Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7514 AE Enschede, the Netherlands
Abstract. Parameters of a process-based forest growth simulator are difficult or impossible to obtain from field observations. Reliable estimates can, however, be obtained using calibration against observations of output and state variables. In this study, we present a Bayesian framework to calibrate the widely used process-based simulator BIOME-BGC against estimates of gross primary production (GPP) data. We used GPP partitioned from flux tower measurements of a net ecosystem exchange over a 55 year old Douglas fir stand as an example. The uncertainties of both the BIOME-BGC parameters and the simulated GPP were estimated. The calibrated parameters leaf and fine root turnover (LFRT), ratio of fine root carbon to leaf carbon (FRC : LC), ratio of carbon to nitrogen in leaf (C : Nleaf), canopy water interception coefficient (Wint), fraction of leaf nitrogen in Rubisco (FLNR), and soil rooting depth (SD) characterize the photosynthesis and carbon and nitrogen allocation in the forest. The calibration improved the root mean square error and enhanced Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency between simulated and flux tower daily GPP compared to the uncalibrated BIOME-BGC. Nevertheless, the seasonal cycle for flux tower GPP was not reproduced exactly, and some overestimate in spring and underestimates in summer remained after calibration. Further analysis showed that, although simulated GPP was time dependent due to carbon allocation, it still followed the variability of the meteorological forcing closely. We hypothesized that the phenology exhibited a seasonal cycle that was not accurately reproduced by the simulator. We investigated this by allowing the parameter values to vary month-by-month. Time varying parameters substantially improved the simulated GPP as compared to GPP obtained with constant parameters. The time varying estimation also revealed a seasonal change in parameter values that determine phenology, and in parameters that determine soil water availability. It was concluded that Bayesian calibration approach can reveal features of the modelled physical processes, and identify aspects of the process simulator that are too rigid.

Citation: Raj, R., Hamm, N. A. S., van der Tol, C., and Stein, A.: Bayesian integration of flux tower data into process-based simulator for quantifying uncertainty in simulated output, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2016-216, in review, 2016.
Rahul Raj et al.
Rahul Raj et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 388 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
270 99 19 388 17 13 27

Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Oct 2016)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Oct 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 388 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

Thereof 386 with geography defined and 2 with unknown origin.

Country # Views %
  • 1

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 22 Oct 2017
Publications Copernicus
Download
Share