Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.252 IF 4.252
  • IF 5-year value: 4.890 IF 5-year 4.890
  • CiteScore value: 4.49 CiteScore 4.49
  • SNIP value: 1.539 SNIP 1.539
  • SJR value: 2.404 SJR 2.404
  • IPP value: 4.28 IPP 4.28
  • h5-index value: 40 h5-index 40
  • Scimago H index value: 51 Scimago H index 51
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-276
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-276
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Development and technical paper 02 Jan 2018

Development and technical paper | 02 Jan 2018

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. A revision of the manuscript for further review has not been submitted.

The Climate Generator: Stochastic climate representation for glacial cycle integration

Mohammad Hizbul Bahar Arif1, Lev Tarasov2, and Tristan Hauser3 Mohammad Hizbul Bahar Arif et al.
  • 1Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University, Canada
  • 2Department of Physics and Physical Oceanography, Memorial University, Canada
  • 3Department of Environmental and Geographical Science, University of Cape Town, South Africa

Abstract. This paper presents a computationally efficient stochastic approach to simulate atmospheric fields (specifically monthly mean temperature and precipitation) on large spatial-temporal scales. In analogy with Weather Generators (WG), the modelling approach can be considered a Climate Generator (CG). The CG can also be understood as a field-specific General Circulation climate Model (GCM) emulator. It invokes aspects of spatio-temporal downscaling, in this case mapping the output of an Energy Balance climate Model (EBM) to that of a higher resolution GCM. The CG produces a synthetic climatology conditioned on various inputs. These inputs include sea level temperature from a fast low-resolution EBM, surface elevation, ice mask, atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, orbital forcing, latitude and longitude. Bayesian Artificial Neural Networks (BANN) are used for nonlinear regression against GCM output over North America, Antarctica and Eurasia.

Herein we detail and validate the methodology. To impose natural variability in the CG (to make the CG indistinguishable from a GCM) stochastic noise is added to each prediction. This noise is generated from a normal distribution with standard deviation computed from the 10% and 90% quantiles of the predictive distribution values from the BANNs for each time step. This derives from a key working assumption/approximation that the self-inferred predictive uncertainty of the BANNs is in good part due to the internal variability of the GCM climate. Our CG is trained against GCM (FAMOUS and CCSM) output for the last deglacial interval (22ka to present year). For predictive testing, we compare the CG predictions against GCM (FAMOUS) output for the disjoint remainder of the last glacial interval (120ka to 22.05ka). The CG passes a climate Turing test, an indistinguishability test in analogy with the original Turing test for artificial intelligence. This initial validation of the Climate Generator approach justifies further development and testing for long time integration contexts such as coupled ice-sheet climate modelling over glacial cycle time-scales.

Mohammad Hizbul Bahar Arif et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Interactive discussion
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Mohammad Hizbul Bahar Arif et al.
Mohammad Hizbul Bahar Arif et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 512 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
381 101 30 512 35 13 28
  • HTML: 381
  • PDF: 101
  • XML: 30
  • Total: 512
  • Supplement: 35
  • BibTeX: 13
  • EndNote: 28
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Jan 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Jan 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 511 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 507 with geography defined and 4 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 10 Dec 2018
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This study is a first step answer to the following question: Can you use emulators (machine learning techniques) to make the output of fast simple climate models (a 2-D energy balance model in this test case) indistinguishable from that of a much more computationally expensive General Circulation climate model (GCM) within the uncertainties of GCMs? Our preliminary test of this concept for large spatio-temporal contexts gives a positive answer.
This study is a first step answer to the following question: Can you use emulators (machine...
Citation
Share