Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.252 IF 4.252
  • IF 5-year value: 4.890 IF 5-year 4.890
  • CiteScore value: 4.49 CiteScore 4.49
  • SNIP value: 1.539 SNIP 1.539
  • SJR value: 2.404 SJR 2.404
  • IPP value: 4.28 IPP 4.28
  • h5-index value: 40 h5-index 40
  • Scimago H index value: 51 Scimago H index 51
Discussion papers | Copyright
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Model evaluation paper 25 Jun 2018

Model evaluation paper | 25 Jun 2018

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Bias correction of multi-ensemble simulations from the HAPPI model intercomparison project

Fahad Saeed1,2, Ingo Bethke3, Stefan Lange4, Ludwig Lierhammer5, Hideo Shiogama6, Dáithí A. Stone7, Tim Trautmann8, and Carl-Friedrich Schleussner1,4,9 Fahad Saeed et al.
  • 1Climate Analytics, Berlin, Germany
  • 2Center of Excellence for Climate Change Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • 3Uni Research Climate, Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, Norway
  • 4Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany
  • 5Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum, Hamburg, Germany
  • 6Center for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
  • 7Computational Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California , USA
  • 8Institute of Physical Geography, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt 60054, Germany
  • 9IRITHESys, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany

Abstract. Prior to using climate data as input for sectoral impact models, statistical bias correction is commonly applied to correct climate model data for systematic deviations. Different approaches have been adopted for this purpose, however the most common are those based on the transfer functions, generated to map the distribution of the simulated historical data to that of the observations. Here, we present results of a novel bias correction method, developed for Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project Phase 2b (ISIMIP2b) and applied to outputs of different GCMs generated within the HAPPI (Half A degree Additional warming, Projections, Prognosis and Impacts) project. We have employed various analysis measures including mean seasonal differences, ensemble variability, annual cycles, extreme indices as well as a global hydrological model to assess the performance of ISIMIP2b bias correction technique. The results indicate substantial improvements after the application of bias correction when compared against observational data. Moreover, the extreme indices as well as output of global hydrological model also reveal a marked improvement. At the same time, the ensemble spread of the original data is preserved after the application of bias correction. We find that the bias corrected HAPPI data can provide a reliable basis for sectoral climate impact projections.

Fahad Saeed et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: final response (author comments only)
Status: final response (author comments only)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Login for Authors/Topical Editors] [Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Fahad Saeed et al.
Fahad Saeed et al.
Total article views: 470 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
364 99 7 470 23 10 9
  • HTML: 364
  • PDF: 99
  • XML: 7
  • Total: 470
  • Supplement: 23
  • BibTeX: 10
  • EndNote: 9
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Jun 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Jun 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 470 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 470 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
No saved metrics found.
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 13 Nov 2018
Publications Copernicus