Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-259
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-259
Submitted as: methods for assessment of models
 | 
02 Nov 2018
Submitted as: methods for assessment of models |  | 02 Nov 2018
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal GMD. A final paper is not foreseen.

Model evaluation by a cloud classification based on multi-sensor observations

Akio Hansen, Felix Ament, Verena Grützun, and Andrea Lammert

Abstract. The detailed understanding of clouds and their macrophysical properties is crucial to reduce uncertainties of cloud feedbacks and related processes in current climate and weather prediction models. Comprehensive evaluation of cloud characteristics using observations is the first step towards any improvement.

An advanced observational product was developed by the Cloudnet project. A multi-sensor synergy of active and passive remote-sensing instruments is used to generate a Target Classification providing detailed information about cloud phase and structure. Nevertheless, this valuable product is only available for observations and there is yet no comparable surrogate for models. Therefore, a new cloud classification algorithm is presented to calculate a comparable classification for models by using the temperature, dew point and all hydrometeor profiles.

The study explains the algorithm and shows possible evaluation methods making use of the new synthetic cloud classification. For example, the statistics of the vertical cloud distribution as well as e.g. the accuracy of cloud forecasts can be investigated regarding different cloud types. The algorithm and methods are exemplarily tested on two months of operational weather forecast data of the COSMO-DE model and compared to a Cloudnet supersite in Germany. Additionally, the cloud classification is applied to Large Eddy Simulations with a similar resolution as of the observations showing detailed cloud structures.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Akio Hansen, Felix Ament, Verena Grützun, and Andrea Lammert

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Akio Hansen, Felix Ament, Verena Grützun, and Andrea Lammert

Data sets

Temperature, dew point and hydrometeor column output of ICON Large Eddy Simulation in Krauthausen (Aachen, Germany) on 2013-04-26. Akio Hansen, Felix Ament, Verena Grützun, and Andrea Lammert https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.895303

HD(CP)2 short term observations, Cloudnet - Target Classification data of Cloudnet products (no. 00), HOPE campaign by LACROS, data version 01. Patric Seifert https://doi.org/10.17616/R3D944

Model code and software

Cloud Classification algorithm (Matlab version) with example dataset of COSMO-DE model. Akio Hansen, Felix Ament, Verena Grützun, and Andrea Lammert https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1458145

Akio Hansen, Felix Ament, Verena Grützun, and Andrea Lammert

Viewed

Total article views: 1,348 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
885 391 72 1,348 65 66
  • HTML: 885
  • PDF: 391
  • XML: 72
  • Total: 1,348
  • BibTeX: 65
  • EndNote: 66
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Nov 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Nov 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,234 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,232 with geography defined and 2 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 18 Apr 2024
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Short summary
Clouds are responsible for large uncertainties in atmospheric models, whereby the evaluation is very challenging due to their complexity. The Cloudnet project uses multi-sensor observations to create a comprehensive Target Classification showing the cloud structure and phase, but there is no comparable model output available. The presented cloud classification algorithm generates a consistent product, which provides a comprehensive view on clouds and is used for further in-depth evaluation.