Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-54
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model evaluation paper
29 Mar 2018
Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Baseline Evaluation of the Impact of Updates to the MIT Earth System Model on its Model Parameter Estimates
Alex G. Libardoni1, Chris E. Forest1,2, Andrei P. Sokolov3, and Erwan Monier3 1Department of Meteorology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
2Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
3Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Abstract. For over twenty years, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Earth System Model (MESM) has been used extensively for climate change research. The model is under continuous development with components being added or updated. To provide transparency in the model development, we perform a baseline evaluation of the newest version by comparing model behavior and properties to the previous model version. In particular, the impacts resulting from updates to the land surface model component and the input forcings used in historical simulations of climate change are investigated. We run an 1800-member ensemble of MESM historical climate simulations where the model parameters that set climate sensitivity, ocean heat uptake, and the net anthropogenic aerosol forcing are systematically varied. By comparing model output to observed patterns of surface temperature changes, the linear trend in the increase in ocean heat content, and upper-air temperature changes, we derive probability distributions for the three model parameters. Furthermore, we run a 372-member ensemble of transient climate simulations where model forcings are held fixed, absent an increase in carbon dioxide concentrations at the rate of 1 \% per year. From these runs, we derive a response surface for transient climate response and thermosteric sea level rise as a function of climate sensitivity and ocean heat uptake. We compare the probability distributions and response surfaces derived using the current version of MESM to the preceding version to evaluate the impact of the updated land surface model and forcing suite. We show that the probability distributions shift towards higher climate sensitivities and weaker aerosol forcing in response to the new forcing suite. The climate response surfaces are relatively unchanged between model versions, indicating that the updated land surface model has limited impact on temperature evolution in the model.
Citation: Libardoni, A. G., Forest, C. E., Sokolov, A. P., and Monier, E.: Baseline Evaluation of the Impact of Updates to the MIT Earth System Model on its Model Parameter Estimates, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-54, in review, 2018.
Alex G. Libardoni et al.
Alex G. Libardoni et al.
Alex G. Libardoni et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 198 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
152 39 7 198 5 7

Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Mar 2018)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Mar 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 198 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

Thereof 197 with geography defined and 1 with unknown origin.

Country # Views %
  • 1

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 26 Apr 2018
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We present a transparent method for evaluating how changes to the MIT Earth System Model will impact its response to anthropogenic and natural forcings. We tested the effects of changes to both components and forcings for shifting distributions of model parameters that agree with historical observations. Overall, changes to model forcings are more important than the new components, while long-term model response is unchanged. The methodology serves as a guide for documenting model development.
We present a transparent method for evaluating how changes to the MIT Earth System Model will...
Share