Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.154 IF 5.154
  • IF 5-year value: 5.697 IF 5-year
    5.697
  • CiteScore value: 5.56 CiteScore
    5.56
  • SNIP value: 1.761 SNIP 1.761
  • IPP value: 5.30 IPP 5.30
  • SJR value: 3.164 SJR 3.164
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 59 Scimago H
    index 59
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-106
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-106
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Model description paper 30 Apr 2019

Model description paper | 30 Apr 2019

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

ACCESS-OM2: A Global Ocean-Sea Ice Model at Three Resolutions

Andrew E. Kiss1,2, Andrew McC. Hogg1,2, Nicholas Hannah3, Fabio Boeira Dias2,4,5,6, Gary B. Brassington7, Matthew A. Chamberlain4, Christopher Chapman4, Peter Dobrohotoff4,5, Catia M. Domingues2,5,6, Earl R. Duran8, Matthew H. England2,8, Russell Fiedler4, Stephen M. Griffies9,10, Aidan Heerdegen1,2, Petra Heil6,11, Ryan M. Holmes2,8,12, Andreas Klocker2,6, Simon J. Marsland2,4,5,6, Adele K. Morrison1,2, James Munroe13, Peter R. Oke4, Maxim Nikurashin2,5, Gabriela S. Pilo2,5, Océane Richet4,14, Abhishek Savita2,4,5,6, Paul Spence2,8, Kial D. Stewart1,8, Marshall L. Ward9,15, Fanghua Wu16, and Xihan Zhang1,2 Andrew E. Kiss et al.
  • 1Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
  • 2ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes, Australia
  • 3Double Precision, Sydney, Australia
  • 4CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Australia
  • 5Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
  • 6Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, Hobart, Australia
  • 7Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Australia
  • 8Climate Change Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  • 9NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
  • 10Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Program, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
  • 11Australian Antarctic Division, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia
  • 12School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New South Wales
  • 13Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John’s, Canada
  • 14Centre for Southern Hemisphere Ocean Research, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
  • 15National Computational Infrastructure, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
  • 16Beijing Climate Centre, Beijing, China

Abstract. We introduce a new version of the ocean-sea ice implementation of the Australian Community Climate and Earth System Simulator, ACCESS-OM2. The model has been developed with the aim of being aligned as closely as possible with the fully coupled (atmosphere-land-ocean-sea ice) ACCESS-CM2. Importantly, the model is available at three different horizontal resolutions: a coarse resolution (nominally 1° horizontal grid spacing), an eddy-permitting resolution (nominally 0.25°) and an eddy-rich resolution (0.1° with 75 vertical levels), where the eddy-rich model is designed to be incorporated into the Bluelink operational ocean prediction and reanalysis system. The different resolutions have been developed simultaneously, both to allow testing at lower resolutions and to permit comparison across resolutions. In this manuscript, the model is introduced and the individual components are documented. The model performance is evaluated across the three different resolutions, highlighting the relative advantages and disadvantages of running ocean-sea ice models at higher resolution. We find that higher resolution is an advantage in resolving flow through small straits, the structure of western boundary currents and the abyssal overturning cell, but that there is scope for improvements in sub-grid scale parameterisations at the highest resolution.

Andrew E. Kiss et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: open (until 02 Aug 2019)
Status: open (until 02 Aug 2019)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Andrew E. Kiss et al.
Data sets

COSIMA Model Output Collection COSIMA https://doi.org/10.4225/41/5a2dc8543105a

Model code and software

The ACCESS-OM2 global ocean - sea ice coupled model Hannah et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2653246

Andrew E. Kiss et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 537 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
383 154 0 537 18 7 1
  • HTML: 383
  • PDF: 154
  • XML: 0
  • Total: 537
  • Supplement: 18
  • BibTeX: 7
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 30 Apr 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 30 Apr 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 392 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 387 with geography defined and 5 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 20 Jul 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We describe new computer model configurations which simulate the global ocean and sea ice at three resolutions. The coarsest resolution is suitable for multi-century climate projection experiments, whereas the finest resolution is designed for more detailed studies over timespans of decades. The paper provides technical details of the model configurations and an assessment of their performance relative to observations.
We describe new computer model configurations which simulate the global ocean and sea ice at...
Citation