Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.252 IF 4.252
  • IF 5-year value: 4.890 IF 5-year
    4.890
  • CiteScore value: 4.49 CiteScore
    4.49
  • SNIP value: 1.539 SNIP 1.539
  • SJR value: 2.404 SJR 2.404
  • IPP value: 4.28 IPP 4.28
  • h5-index value: 40 h5-index 40
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 51 Scimago H
    index 51
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-111
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-111
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Model description paper 21 May 2019

Model description paper | 21 May 2019

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Development of “Physical Parametrizations with PYthon” (PPPY, version 1.1), and its usage to reduce the time-step dependency in the ICE microphysical scheme

Sébastien Riette Sébastien Riette
  • CNRM, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France

Abstract. To help develop and compare physical parametrizations such as those found in a numerical weather or climate model, a new tool was developed. The tool provides a framework to plug external parametrizations, run them in an offline mode, save the results and plot diagnostics. With the help of this tool, the origin of the time-step dependency of the microphysical scheme used in the Météo-France small scale operational numerical weather model was identified. The sources of dependency lied in some process formulations and in the algorithm used to allow the competition between the different processes. Some corrections have been introduced and their efficiency was checked with the tool. This usage illustrates how the tool can be used in 0D or 1D mode, with schemes coming from different models and with different time-advance methods to produce different kinds of plots.

Sébastien Riette
Interactive discussion
Status: open (until 16 Jul 2019)
Status: open (until 16 Jul 2019)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Sébastien Riette
Sébastien Riette
Viewed  
Total article views: 175 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
136 38 1 175 1 2
  • HTML: 136
  • PDF: 38
  • XML: 1
  • Total: 175
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 May 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 May 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 164 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 162 with geography defined and 2 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 16 Jun 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Numerical weather or climate models make use of a number of different interacting parametrizations to represent different physical processes. PPPY 1.1 is a python package for running and comparing individual parametrizations in an offline mode, independently from other parametrizations and from the hosting model. In this paper the tool is described and used to assess and reduce the time-step dependency present in a microphysical parametrization.
Numerical weather or climate models make use of a number of different interacting...
Citation