Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.154 IF 5.154
  • IF 5-year value: 5.697 IF 5-year
    5.697
  • CiteScore value: 5.56 CiteScore
    5.56
  • SNIP value: 1.761 SNIP 1.761
  • IPP value: 5.30 IPP 5.30
  • SJR value: 3.164 SJR 3.164
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 59 Scimago H
    index 59
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-268
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-268
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Submitted as: methods for assessment of models 11 Nov 2019

Submitted as: methods for assessment of models | 11 Nov 2019

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Observations for Model Intercomparison Project (Obs4MIPs): Status for CMIP6

Duane Waliser1, Peter J. Gleckler2, Robert Ferraro1, Karl E. Taylor2, Sasha Ames3, James Biard4, Michael G. Bosilovich5, Otis Brown4, Helene Chepfer6, Luca Cinquini1,7, Paul Durack2, Veronika Eyring8,9, Pierre-Philippe Mathieu10, Tsengdar Lee11, Simon Pinnock10, Gerald L. Potter5, Michel Rixen12, Roger Saunders13, Jörg Shulz14, Jean-Noël Thepaut15, and Matthias Tuma12 Duane Waliser et al.
  • 1Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
  • 2Program for Climate Model Diagnostics and Intercomparison, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA
  • 3Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA
  • 4North Carolina Institute for Cliamte Studies, North Carolina State University, Asheville, North Carolina, USA
  • 5Goddard Space Flight Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
  • 6Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique/Institut Pierre Simon Laplace, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
  • 7Earth System Research Laboratory, National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA
  • 8Deutsches Zentrum für Luft-und Raumfahrt, Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
  • 9University of Bremen, Institute of Environmental Physics (IUP), Bremen, Germany
  • 10Climate Office, European Space Agency, Harlwell, UK
  • 11Earth Science Division, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, USA
  • 12World Climate Research Programme, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
  • 13MetOffice, Exeter, UK
  • 14European Organisation for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites (EUMETSAT), Darmstadt, Germany
  • 15European Centre of Medium-Range Weather Forecasting, Reading, UK

Abstract. The Observations for Model Intercomparison Projects (Obs4MIPs) was initiated in 2010 to facilitate the use of observations in climate model evaluation and research, with a particular target being the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP), a major initiative of the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP). To this end, Obs4MIPs: 1) targets observed variables that can be compared to CMIP model variables, 2) utilizes dataset formatting specifications and metadata requirements closely aligned with CMIP model output, 3) provides brief technical documentation for each dataset, designed for non-experts and tailored towards relevance for model evaluation, including information on uncertainty, dataset merits and limitations, and 4) disseminates the data through the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) platforms, making the observations searchable and accessible via the same portals as the model output. Taken together, these characteristics of the organization and structure of obs4MIPs should entice a more diverse community of researchers to engage in the comparison of model output with observations and to contribute to a more comprehensive evaluation of the climate models.

At present, the number of obs4MIPs datasets has grown to about 80, many undergoing updates, with another 20 or so in preparation, and more than 100 proposed and under consideration. Current global satellite-based datasets include, but are not limited to, humidity and temperature profiles; a wide range of cloud and aerosol observations; ocean surface wind, temperature, height, and sea ice fraction; surface and top of atmosphere longwave and shortwave radiation; along with ozone (O3), methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) products. Proposed products expected for inclusion for CMIP6 analysis include, but are not limited to, alternative products for the above quantities, along with additional products for ocean surface flux and chlorophyll products, a number of vegetation products (e.g. FAPAR, LAI, burnt area fraction), ice sheet mass and height, carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). While most obs4MIPs datasets are delivered as monthly and global, greater emphasis is being places on products with higher time resolution (e.g. daily) and/or regional products.

Along with an increasing number of datasets, obs4MIPs has implemented a number of capability upgrades including: 1) an updated obs4MIPs data specifications document that provides for additional search facets and generally improves congruence with CMIP6 specifications for model datasets, 2) a set of six easily understood indicators that help guide users as to a dataset’s maturity and suitability for application, and 3) an option to supply supplemental information about a dataset beyond what can be found in the standard metadata. With the maturation of the obs4MIPs framework, the dataset inclusion process, and the dataset formatting guidelines and resources, the scope of the observations being considered is expected to grow to include gridded in-situ datasets as well as datasets with a regional focus, and the ultimate intent is to judiciously expand this scope to any observation dataset that has applicability for evaluation of the types of Earth System models used in CMIP.

Duane Waliser et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: open (until 14 Jan 2020)
Status: open (until 14 Jan 2020)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Duane Waliser et al.
Duane Waliser et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 236 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
178 56 2 236 4 7
  • HTML: 178
  • PDF: 56
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 236
  • BibTeX: 4
  • EndNote: 7
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Nov 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Nov 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 146 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 146 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 14 Dec 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This paper provides an update to an international research activity whose objective is to facilitate access to satellite and other types of regional and global datasets for evaluating global models used to produce 21st century climate projections.
This paper provides an update to an international research activity whose objective is to...
Citation