Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.154 IF 5.154
  • IF 5-year value: 5.697 IF 5-year
    5.697
  • CiteScore value: 5.56 CiteScore
    5.56
  • SNIP value: 1.761 SNIP 1.761
  • IPP value: 5.30 IPP 5.30
  • SJR value: 3.164 SJR 3.164
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 59 Scimago H
    index 59
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-92
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-92
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Submitted as: development and technical paper 19 May 2020

Submitted as: development and technical paper | 19 May 2020

Review status
This preprint is currently under review for the journal GMD.

Improving dust simulations in WRF-Chem model v4.1.3 coupled with GOCART aerosol module

Alexander Ukhov1, Ravan Ahmadov2,3, Georg Grell3, and Georgiy Stenchikov1 Alexander Ukhov et al.
  • 1King Abdullah University of Science and Technology,Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
  • 2CIRES, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
  • 3NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA

Abstract. In this paper, we rectify inconsistencies that emerge in the WRF-Chem code when using the Goddard Chemistry Aerosol Radiation and Transport (GOCART) aerosol module. These inconsistencies have been reported and corrections have been implemented in WRF-Chem v4.1.3. Here, we use a WRF-Chem experimental setup configured over the Middle East (ME) to estimate the effects of these inconsistencies. Firstly, we show that the diagnostic output of PM2.5 surface concentration was underestimated by 7% and PM10 was overestimated by 5 %. Secondly, we demonstrate that the contribution of sub-micron dust particles was underestimated in the calculation of optical properties and thus, Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) was consequently underestimated by 25–30 %. Thirdly, we show that an inconsistency in the process of gravitational settling led to the overestimation of the dust column loadings by 4–6 %, PM10 surface concentrations by 2–4 %, and the rate of dust gravitational settling by 5–10 %. We present a methodology to calculate diagnostics that can be used to estimate the effects of these applied changes. Our corrections also help to explain the overestimation of PM10 surface concentrations encountered in many WRF-Chem simulations. We also share the developed Merra2BC interpolator, which allows constructing initial and boundary conditions for chemical species and aerosols based on MERRA-2 reanalysis. The results of this work can be useful for those who simulate the dust cycle using the WRF-Chem model coupled with the GOCART aerosol module.

Alexander Ukhov et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: open (until 14 Jul 2020)
Status: open (until 14 Jul 2020)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Alexander Ukhov et al.

Model code and software

Merra2BC. Interpolation utility for boundary and initial conditions used in WRF-Chem A. Ukhov and G. Stenchikov https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3695911

Alexander Ukhov et al.

Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 31 May 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We discuss and evaluate the effects of inconsistencies found in the WRF-Chem code when using the GOCART module. Firstly, PM surface concentrations were miscalculated. Secondly, dust optical depth was underestimated by 25–30 %. Thirdly, an inconsistency in the process of gravitational settling led to the overestimation of the dust column loadings by 4–6 %, PM10 by 2–4 %, and the rate of gravitational dust settling by 5–10 %. We also presented diagnostics that can be used to estimate these effects.
We discuss and evaluate the effects of inconsistencies found in the WRF-Chem code when using the...
Citation